| 翻訳と辞書 |
| Legitimacy of NATO bombing of Yugoslavia ： ウィキペディア英語版 |
Legitimacy of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia
The legitimacy of the 1999 NATO bombing of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia has been questioned by various parties. The key basis governing the legality of any act of war is international law. In this particular case, a course of action is also bound by other foundations such as the NATO and UN charters, both of which were drafted in accordance with pre-existing international regulation. Proponents of both viewpoints have cited particular legislation that substantiate their claims on whether the bombing was legal or not.
Supporters of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia have argued that the bombing brought to an end the ethnic cleansing of Kosovo's Albanian population, and that it hastened (or caused) the downfall of Slobodan Milošević's government, which they saw as responsible for the international isolation of Yugoslavia, many war crimes, and gross human rights violations. Others view the action as of dubious legality.
==Legal arguments==
抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』
■ウィキペディアで「Legitimacy of the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia」の詳細全文を読む
スポンサード リンク
| 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース |
Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.
|
|